Khlong Luang Information Site

Just another Khlong Luang Information Site

January 9th, 2012

It’s “pedestrian itinerary production,” not the “avoid ghetto” toggle, but diverse pundits have already miscategorized Microsoft’s latest patent for a feature that would permit Windows Phones to produce more user-friendly route navigation for those on foot.

So where does the “ghetto” part arrived into play? Presumably, decent in the first business of Microsoft’s description of patent No. 8,090,532: “As a pedestrian travels, diverse difficulties could be encountered, such equally traveling through an unsafe locality or being in an open expanse that is subject to harsh temperatures.”

The fix, suggests Microsoft, is to merge an assessment of a user’s behaviors with the user’s upcoming tasks and some relevant external data sets. For example, Microsoft’s mobile route-generation organisation could “learn” that a user leaves form at 5 p.m. each day and questions to a green emplacement home. Since the system’s pedestrian-focused, it could purpose a route that a vehicle couldn’t navigate to hand the user the quickest potential walkway home.

“In addition, unexpected results can take spot through exercise of the exposed innovation,” reads Microsoft’s patent. “As an illustration, a pedestrian could arrive at a placement faster than if she traveled in a vehicle by taking more point paths, withal a vehicle unremarkably travels much faster. Due to detailed path planning, a direction laid can exist made that allows a user to take more diverse paths that may compensate for a general lack of speed.”

But that’s not all. The system could also accept a user’s chronicle into chronicle (“paths previously needed by a user, available paths, user experiences upon the paths, etc.”) equally substantially equally any potential stops that might otherwise modify a user’s normal itinerary on a given daylight similar a calendar appointment that would force a user to blockage someplace after forge on the mode home, for example.

As for the “avoid ghetto” bit, Microsoft besides indicates that its pedestrian path navigation organisation could take database information into chronicle when planning one’s walking route, which could include endure information, crime statistics, and demographic information. Only the specific crime statistics or demographics that Microsoft’s organisation might consider, and what the doorway might be that would deem a route55555 “unsafe” by the system, wasn’t specified.

The crux of Microsoft’s patent is that it wants to build a real-time navigational arrangement that gives users the best possible paseo home, using a combination of a walker’s preferences, third-party data, and the specific choices a mortal makes during the paseo itself (like the benefits of switching to public transit mid-way, for example). The “avoid ghetto” mark is a routine of a misnomer; Microsoft appears to desire its users to be able to avoid any and totally transit headaches.

November 16th, 2011

Microsoft on Tuesday slammed the threshold on updating third-party software via Windows Update in the upcoming Windows 8.

One security expert enunciated the fellowship was missing a large chance to amend the overall security of Windows PCs.

The new operating arrangement will not update non-Microsoft software, enounced Farzana Rahman, the group program manager for Windows Update, in a blog post.

“The wide kind of delivery mechanisms, installation tools, and overall approaches to updates across the total breadth of applications makes it impossible to push whole updates through [the Windows Update] mechanism,” pronounced Rahman said. “As frustrating as this might be, it is likewise an important part of the ecosystem that we cannot only revisit for the installed basis of software.”

Rahman’s command was the clearest always by Microsoft that it would not have other applications under its update wing.

Currently, the society offers customers updates to Windows drivers — third-party files needed to flowed the Os — via Windows Update, and occasionally disables third-party ActiveX controls in Internet Explorer (IE) at vendors’ requests. And that’s how it’s moving to stay, Rahman said.

She did add that Microsoft feels its customers’ pain.

“People intelligibly observe the receive with multiple updaters on the organization less than optimal, and we agree,” Rahman said. “Each application updater gives you a different experience, you have to remember to dead visit each updater to install updates, you never know when or how updaters will coursed and what they might do, and thence on. People would alike one updater for the intact system.”

Yes, they would, said Wolfgang Kandek, chief technology policeman for Qualys, and an advocate for Microsoft’s updating other companies’ Windows software.

“I understand the thinking,” enunciated Kandek of Microsoft’s reasons for not pushing third-party updates, “but at the same time, it’s a little disappointing. Microsoft could collect a brobdingnagian quantity of goodwill by doing this, and it would be a brobdingnagian leap for security.”

Kandek argued that although eve Microsoft doesn’t experience the resources to validate every application’s update, it could surely focus on the nearly important vendors whose products motivation to be incessantly updated. His examples: Adobe’s Reader and Flash Player.

“I would argue that there are sure organizations, and Adobe is one of them, where [Microsoft taking on updating duties] would exist possible,” Kandek continued. “There are exclusively a match of [vendors] that they would need to address, and they’re mature companies with well-tested updates.”

Both Flash Player and Adobe Lector experience been patched multiple times this year: Adobe has issued nine security updates for the Flash Player and five for the Lector hence far in 2011.